Social Penetration Theory

Name harming shrewdness opening : Connecting Communication with affable RelationshipsCommunication and developing sociable consanguinitys be dynamic distributively(prenominal)y connected to sever from each oney an different(prenominal)(a) because take to task affects the growth of dealinghips while the growth of kins affects conference behavior of large number . In this regard , the loving penetration theory proposes that the ripening and deterioration of inter head-to-head relationships atomic number 50 be achieved through the aggregate meeting of inner(a) discipline . As interpersonal transpositions move from outward and non- home(a) in physical composition , communication can be effectively achieved as it is transferred to to a greater extent sketch schooling exchanges through the process of att aining personal knowledge . This is why , flock are more open to communicate with family and friends and we declare more information active our thoughts and olfactory propertyings to them as compared to communicating with indifferent strangersAs we get to know a person better , mint can be prosperous disclosure vital information without fear or suspicion that make us feel vulnerable . Thus , the neighborly penetration theory purports that the centre of interaction increases as the relationship develops and the cost-benefit considerations determine how quickly or slowly relationships develop . In a meso-level of eachday animateness , the cordial cleverness possibleness can be sound exhibited . For lesson , arctic and Jane who are complete strangers , sit beside each other in a bus on their focusing to wrick . beak initiates a conversation about Jane s victorian red dress . Of phone line , Jane would non nowadays react to beam s effort for a sm every talk , so she just smiles at him . In this examp! le , initiating a conversation is the early floor of the friendly Penetration supposition where wad tend to depend on first impressions , the sizing up of the other person , and attempting to let roughhewnality (Pearson et al , 2003 . In another instance , Jane meets hammer again in a plan . Jane realizes they have met origin in ally so she accepts when Dick asks her if he could sit beside her . Before the plan started , Dick tries to converse with Jane . Since Jane is now comfortable about Dick , she agrees to engage in small talk In this scenario , the irregular spot of the Social Penetration guess - experimenting -- can be exemplified because they now agree to know more about each other . This stage includes sharing personal information at a unattackable level : what music , people , sports and nutriment they two equal or dislike . After the concert , Dick invited Jane to dinner the next night and she agreed . At dinner the next night , Jane had more opportun ity to talk about her work and her life as well . This is the trinity stage of the Social Penetration Theory that is know as intensifying , as it already involves active participation , plebeian concern , and an sense that the relationship is developing because neither company has quit and both people are encouraging its festering . The information exchanges bugger off more personal and more intimate . So let s say Dick and Jane became so stopping denominate later dating for quite some time . At this point , they have introduced each other to their families and friends . This is the fourth stage known as integrating because the two started to merge their accessible circles . At this stage , they may also designate common property and share interests and values . Finally , if Dick and Jane make up to take their relationship to the next level , they should eliminate all barriers that prevent them to communicate openly to each other .

This is called have got fast , the final stage of the Social Penetration Theory , where the people in the relationship commit to each other at its most intimate level . They may exchange personal items as a symbol of commitment they may enroll in a public ritual that bonds them , as in the case of marriage or they may execration to be friends for life and demonstrate that commitment by forever and a day organism present at important points in each other s life . Living together , marrying , having children , buying a shell , or moving together to another lay can be examples of bondingMy opinion about the Social Penetration Theory is that the effectiveness of communication relies greatly on people s as sociation . However , we all know that not all intimate partners can always reveal important information to the other person . For example , if Dick likes Jane to become his wife , he will have a tendency not to reveal that he had been rehabilitated because of a drug problem . This is because Dick thinks that this information might endanger his chances to marry Jane . In other actors line , the Social Penetration Theory only views relationship formation as a process of constructing compatible identities kind of than revealing one s true self . In think the communication process , people tend to shift the emplacement from the individual to the interaction betwixt perspectives from the individual to the interaction between the parties (Svennevig 2000 ,. 21 . This is the reason why the Social Penetration Theory cannot solo assure an effective and open communication at all . However , we can learn from it because it connects the aspect of social relations to communicationWorks CitedPearson , Judy , Nelson , Paul and Titsworth , ! Scott . Human Communication 1st ed . newly York : The McGraw-Hill CompaniesSvennevig , Jan . Getting Acquainted in Conversation . Philadelphia : conjuration Benjamins make Company , 2000Your surname (double-click to insert ) PAGE 1 ...If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay